Showing posts with label Rick Santorum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rick Santorum. Show all posts

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Yahoo News Periodic Updates, April 14, 2012


On occasion, I consolidate comments I’d attempted to post in response to articles appearing recently on Yahoo News. I share my comments with you here hoping to reach an audience immune from Yahoo’s periodic attempts to block or censor. My posts are written as if I actually were the US President. As is my usual custom, if I open with a quoted item, that’s from the article itself.

I hope you enjoy all 23 of these mini-essays.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


ONE:

I saw a guy wearing a black hoodie with this magic-markered in white across the front:

Tray von Attitude

Crude but effective - speaks volumes.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"And mercy is still spelled m-e-r-c-y."



TWO:

[In reference to the “legality” of the recent (failed) North Korean rocket launch.]

“…[U.N. Security Council] Resolution No. 1874 … applies to both military and civilian launches…” No, it doesn’t. I read 1874 and it doesn’t ban civilian launches at all. No wonder this Russian official, who spouted this blatant falsehood, wished to remain anonymous. Americans have been propagandized into thinking Russian officials tell lies; so what’s our excuse when we make exactly the same claims?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“If we can’t all agree that telling the truth matters, we might as well stop pretending we’re so noble.”



THREE:

I am an angry God. I am a jealous God. I am…Abraham!

[Post script: What follows is what I wish I had added to the 13 words above:

“Before the Creation, there was only God and since God is perfect, that means only perfection existed. After the Creation, imperfection was brought into being. And that was true, even before God got around to creating living beings.

“How so? How could God’s creation be anything less than perfect? Simple! Even though it was created by God, the Creation itself was not God and since only God is perfect, anything “not God” must be considered less than perfect.

“It was only after the Creation that God could have said, “I am an angry God. I am a jealous God,” since before the Creation, God had nothing to be neither jealous about nor angry at – since there was only God. So it could be said that the Creation brought God down, since it brought out certain base and out all-too-human traits in this otherwise (formerly) Perfect Being.

“As for the last part I wrote – “I am…Abraham!” – my suspicion is that Abraham created God – or, at least, created Him as we understand Him.”]



FOUR:

[This was my response to an article about (currently) Roman Catholic Marco Rubio, potential Mitt Romney running mate.]

Out of one side of his mouth, Marcus Rubix-Cubio says, “I’m not a theologian.” Out of the other side of his mouth, he says, “I consider [Mormons] Christians.” OK, Marcus, let’s try this one out of size: “If your Roman Pope were to weigh in and say, ‘I don’t consider Mormons to be Christians,’ what would you say?”

Lest you wish to conveniently “forget,” Marcus, I (a Buddhist) shall remind you: “Your Pope is infallible in matters of faith and you are religiously bound to follow his teachings.” You might not be a theologian, but when someone (say, like me, for instance) asks you how you’d respond if your Pope were to deny the Mormons, you must also state that you’d also deny the Mormons.

I’m not a theologian either, but I discovered this much on line (it’s on google; ever hear of that?): “On June 5, 2001, the Pope declared that Mormon baptisms aren’t valid.” Say, we might be on to something there. I have to wonder, though, why the Pope doesn’t come right out and say, “Mormons aren’t Christians.”

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“It is written: Politics make strange bedfellows. It should be written: And so do ‘popes’ and Popes.”



FIVE:

[The following came out during an interview of Rick Warren, well-known senior pastor of Saddleback Church and author of The Purpose Driven Life.]


“…the greatest compliment that Jesus ever gave…[:] ‘I've never seen such faith in all of Israel.’” Maybe, just maybe, Jesus wasn’t complimenting that soldier as much as He was condemning the state of faith “in all of Israel.” Pretty much the same could be said of today’s Israel – very violent, very intolerant, and lacking in faith.

“…but God loves every soldier.” Hmm…so that means God loves the soldiers of the Taliban and al-Qaida?

Most soldiers are not agents of peace nor do they think of themselves that way – at least not as agents of universal peace. More likely, “Peace for me and mine, and screw you and yours.” [Yeah, I'd heard these sentiments when I was in the service.] My idea of a Godly warrior is one who doesn’t carry a weapon, fights for peace with his God-given talents, and knows God is on his side whether he succeeds in his mission or not.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Rick Warren, I think you better give up your day job.”



SIX:

“The interesting thing is, [Mike Wallace] never mentions '60 Minutes.' It's as if it didn't exist.” Well, he was in good company. For millions of Americans (who aren’t We-the-Sheeple) “60 Minutes” was irrelevant and assiduously avoided. It never fails to amaze me how we’re so satisfied to get our “news” from a handful of “icons.” There’s way more to the world than “60 Minutes” will deign to share with you. But then again, they are corporate media, aren’t they?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
     “The only thing I remember about Mike Wallace? He had a commanding voice. SFW.”



SEVEN:

The biggest miracle connected to the name of Jesus? That He died for our sins.

Consider:

·       If somebody else works extra hard, do you get a raise in your paycheck?

·       If somebody else murders somebody in Atlanta, do you in Chicago (at the time of the murder) go to jail?

·       If somebody else said, “Let me make love to your wife instead of you; it will be the same as if you did it,” wouldn’t you slug the SOB?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“What a scam!”



EIGHT:

“But, Land said, ‘as his friend I would say to him…” If Land was any kind of a friend, he would have said these words face-to-face, in private, to Santorum. But, no, Richard Land takes the weenie way out and urges Rick to drop out in a nationally-broadcast interview. Had it been in private, maybe Santorum could have argued a case (you know, friend-to-friend) as to why he should stay in the race.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“This is one of many reasons why I’m not too keen on either evangelical Christians or Pubbers; this episode is rather representative of their conduct.”



NINE:

The only reason I saw Hunger Games was Jennifer Lawrence, who I thought did a good job in Winter’s Bone. Truth be told? I thought Hunger Games was terrible. I couldn’t get over how the name “Katniss” sounds uncomfortably like “catnip.” Yup, catnip for the masses. Come on, people, we can do better than this.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Or maybe we can’t (sigh).”



TEN:

What the UN has banned are ballistic missile tests. So why don’t we define what that is?

From Wikipedia: “A ballistic missile…follows a sub-orbital ballistic flightpath with the objective of [my emphasis – Steve] delivering one or more warheads to a predetermined target.”

Since the North Korean spacecraft will have an observation satellite as its payload, I don’t see what the problem is.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Maybe we’ll start telling countries like Brazil (you know, since it’s so close to the US) that they can’t launch satellites into orbit. Our protestations are nothing more than a measure of our fear.”



ELEVEN:

Pinstripes,

Ford took his own chance away by pardoning Nixon. He didn't have to do that and he shouldn't have done that. But he did and for the world's worst reason - a reason shared by too many Americans: We don't think, but instead make decisions based on our programming.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"And if you think about it, most of the responses on this thread are prompted by programming. All I'm asking is that people actually read and think about what the military oath of enlistment actually says."



TWELVE:

“another grave provocation?” How is [North Korea] launching a satellite a “grave” provocation? Every country has the right to launch satellites, since the New World Order hasn’t yet gotten around to a total ban (except for countries already in the Club of Rome). The UN resolution banned ballistic missile launches only.

As for digging a tunnel, if NK wants to dig dirt, even if it’s in preparation for a nuke test, who are we to take offense? That would be the pot calling the kettle black, since we had plenty of turns at “dirt digging” in the 1950s. Worse than what the North Koreans are doing is what this report is doing to the plain meaning of words.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“You may rank ‘another grave provocation’ with ‘arbeit macht frei’ in terms of linguistic abuse.”



THIRTEEN:

I went to Zimm’s website and clicked a link he calls “The Facts.” However, Zimm [defendant in the Trayon Martin murder case] doesn’t offer any. Instead, he says he “cannot discuss the details of the event on Feburary 26th,” and “the facts will come to light.”

Well, George, I suppose some fools will donate before you make a publicly available statement to the cops. I say “fools” because who in their right mind would donate without any kind of statement from the (potential) defendant?

Tell you what, George, I’d rather donate money to Trayvon’s family who will need all they can get to hire a good lawyer to take you to court based on a wrongful death lawsuit.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I’d feel better about Zimm’s plea for cash if he would have included a statement that, should he be ultimately absolved of any wrongdoing, he’d donate any excess money collected to Trayvon’s family.”



FOURTEEN:

“It would have not been unlawful or even improper for [George Zimmerman] to follow [Trayvon Martin]. You can even follow me home if you want to," [attorney] Uhrig said. Well…Uhrig is giving his permission, whereas Trayvon didn’t give his. And following is one thing; stalking with a weapon is quite another. Also, what else is a lawyer going to say? That he thinks his (former) client is guilty as hell? Where on earth do these pinheads come from?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“The lawyers probably dropped Zimm because he couldn’t pay their retainer.”



FIFTEEN:

Wouldn't it be funny if everybody Romney asked [to be his running mate] turned him down? Of course, that wouldn't really happen. Someone would step up to the plate for the good of the party. But not because Money(R) has any chance of winning. Sorry, folks, it is what it is. The Dems thought Dubya would be a one term prez. Now the Pubbers are about to learn what that feels like.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"Part of the reason for Romney's wealth has to do with his Mormon Connections. But...they won't be enough to help the entire country."



SIXTEEN:

“…[being forced to buy insurance as mandated by ObamaCare] is a requirement to engage in commerce which the constitution does not allow.” The uninsured are already forcing the rest of us to “engage in commerce” by having to cover them. So, it could be argued, ObamaCare is an attempt to regulate that bit of commerce.

Of course, Congress could have just flat out made it illegal not to have insurance, but it realized that wouldn’t accomplish its mission under Article I, Section 8:

“The Congress shall have power to…provide for the common defense and general welfare…”

Nobody quibbles about the “common defense” part, so nobody should protest about Congress’s power to provide for the “general welfare.” Team Obama should have focused, not necessarily or exclusively, on the Commerce Clause, but also on the “general welfare” clause.

[Side Note: In my state, Illinois, people are forced to engage in commerce by having to buy auto insurance in order to legally drive. So this whole notion of being forced to engage in commerce is something we’re all used to, to some degree or another, anyway.]

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Our choice on how effectively we can engage in commerce (above and beyond "mere" regulation) is already dictated to us by our debt burden and income taxes; not to mention how the military draft in its day had affected the ability of soldiers to engage in commerce.”



SEVENTEEN:

Sounds like Allen West [GOP Congressman saying (about) 80 Congressional Democrats are card-carrying Communists] is trying to answer a question, since the crash-and-burn of Herman Cain, “Who’s gonna fill dem shoes?” The CPC should sue West for defamation, since it’s doubtful that even one of their members is a card-carrying member of the Communist Party. West sounds like another pol who doesn’t understand and can’t use plain English.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Where do we find these people and why do we keep electing them?”



EIGHTEEN:

[This response is to an article about Jews pleading for the release of Jonathan Pollard, a Jew who spied on the US for the benefit of Israel, from a US jail where he’s been a “guest” for the last 25 years.]


There are two notable words missing from this article. Let me reword this sentence from the article using those two words: “Peres, a Nobel Peace laureate, responded by appealing to Israeli authorities to grant MORDECAI VANUNU unrestricted freedom as a humanitarian gesture.”

Back in 2008, when I first ran for US President, this was included in my written contract: “I will immediately release federal prisoner Jonathan Jay Pollard.” That was electoral promise #40, followed by this (#41): “I will award to Mordechai Vanunu the Presidential Medal of Freedom, our nation's highest civilian award. I will also attempt to arrange for Mr. Vanunu's release from Israel and for the granting of asylum in a country of his choice.”

Please note: I didn’t make make #40 dependent on Israel granting peace of mind to Vanunu. I don’t believe in trading in human flesh; just in trying to do the right thing not contingent on what others do.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I was then (in 2008) and am now (in 2012) the only presidential candidate in the history of this country to offer a written contract in exchange for election, forfeiting the presidency should I violate any of my contract’s 47 promises.”



NINETEEN:

[I posted the following five words to an article about two US Marines who were killed in a helicopter crash while participating in joint military exercises with Moroccan forces: Why are we in Morocco?]

Then I responded to these three who had tried to answer my question:

@GaryL,

The third paragraph? And just what does that tell us besides the name (without any elaboration) of a military exercise? Are you always that satisfied with the content of the news reports you read?

@ Silly Walk,

The article doesn’t tell us anything, hence my question.

@ Bubba,

Of course we had excellent relations with the Moroccan government, though you really can’t (at least now) say the same concerning their people. Our role (then and now) is to prop up yet another absolute dictator. And he fully appreciates our services.

@ all who didn’t really grasp my simple question:

Arab Spring never came to Morocco, though the many Moroccans I know in the States say “The Moroccan people are not happy.” Our continuing role in countries like Morocco is similar to what our role was in various South American countries. And that was for our military to ingratiate itself with local militaries to keep the local oligarchs in power. A lot of them caught on to our scam, which is why we’re not much loved south of the border.

Our workings in Morocco dovetail with our other infiltrating activities (for instance, the campaign against the LRA) throughout Africa. And these are the activities of a dying imperial empire trying to dominate an entire continent strictly for its own advantage.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I have often found that it is the members of our active duty military who are the most clueless about our grand strategic designs. It must be great not to have to think: "Sir, yes, sir!'”



TWENTY:

It might have helped Santorum's chances of getting Mitt's nod for VP if Santy had bothered to endorse Mitt upon dropping his own bid.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"Why didn't Rick endorse the only other conservative remaining in the race, Newt Gingrich? Why do so many ranking Pubbers have a problem endorsing Mitt?"



TWENTY-ONE:

[This is in response to James C, who had replied to my post which read: “I wish this article had bothered to mention whether the Syrian government had actually given its OK for these observers to enter their country.”]


James C,

I’m not as concerned about “these people” as I am about the encroachment of the NWO. If the UN can vote to send unarmed forces into a country against its will, it wouldn’t be much of a stretch to claim the UN has the authority to send ARMED forces into a country against its will. And, when the time comes (and it probably will) that the US decides it doesn’t need the UN any longer, it might decide it has the sole right to send armed forces into any country it wishes – with or without the backing of or permission of anybody. And that should concern everybody.

James, you are a bit of a simpleton, aren’t you? Seeing that I’m from Chicago somehow empowered you to draw all kinds of conclusions about me. But if you had taken a few moments to google my name, you would have discovered I had actually run against Obama in 2008 (and am running against him now). Since my campaign never caught on, you may be somewhat forgiven for never having heard of me. But you can’t be forgiven for jumping to conclusions.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I am profoundly concerned about the downward spiral in the common sense of too many of our citizens.”



TWENTY-TWO:

I loved this new [Three] Stooges movie. I'm glad 3 relative unknowns got this chance at Stooge greatness.  They didn't disappoint.  And it was a nice touch at the end, when it was explained to the kids in the audience never to eye-poke anybody and that the hammers used were rubber. A demo, with and without sound effects, made the point.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"Yeah, it's okay for a presidential candidate to love the Stooges."



TWENTY-THREE:

[Ricardo responded to my post (immediately above) by writing: “Hahahhahahaa is Searle the 4th long lost Stooge? Keep dreaming on that 2012, kiddo.” This is my answer to him.]


Ricardo,

I don’t know where you come from, but in the good old US of A, anybody can run for president. Now, do I have a realistic chance? Of course not. So why do I bother? The answer to that can be answered by people who have actually gone on line and read my material. That is, “You’ve got some great ideas, especially the one about offering a written contract in exchange for votes.”

That’s my innovation; I’m the only presidential candidate (in 2008 & 2012) to have ever offered a contract listing my campaign promises, which (were I to fail to keep every single one) would forfeit my office.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Ricardo, it’s programmed people like you who can’t give independents a chance, relying instead on rigid Brand X vs. Brand Y (Pubber vs. Dem) thinking.”


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
Founder of The Independent Contractors’ Party
“Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk? Why cointainly!”


Contact me at bpa_cinc@yahoo.com

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Yahoo News Periodic Updates, March 19, 2012

On occasion, I consolidate comments I’d attempted to post in response to articles appearing recently on Yahoo News. I share my comments with you here hoping to reach an audience immune from Yahoo’s periodic attempts to block or censor. My posts are written as if I actually were the US President. As is my usual custom, if I open with a quoted item, that’s from the article itself.

I hope you enjoy all sixteen* of these mini-essays.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 
ONE A:

[sixteen*:  I couldn’t resist this late addition, so I added this sixteenth calling it ONE A. This is my reply to an article about a racist, anti-Obama bumper sticker featuring: “Don’t Re-Nig.”]


“if you take the top message at its literal meaning, to not renege in 2012…” Hold on there, hoss. The literal meaning has to be derived from what the sticker actually says, which isn’t “not to renege.” It says “Don’t Re-Nig.” A more accurate translation would be “Don’t re-elect the N*gger.” THAT’s its literal meaning.

As a play on words, reneg is both ancient and unfortunate. Forty years ago, when I was in the USAF, a fellow troop asked me (and, without waiting for me to reply, answered his own question): “What do you call one who renegs? A renigger.”

I’m waiting to hear the GOP’s final four vehemently condemn this sticker in no uncertain words. For if they don’t, we may well be looking at a sticker that will go a long way toward reelecting Obama.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Let me coin a new term: Reverse racism = an attempt to be racist that backfires.”

ONE B:

[RE: Article headline: “Rick Santorum: ‘The dangers of carbon dioxide? Tell that to a plant’” – I didn’t post the following to Yahoo due to extra Agreement terms I’d have to embrace.]:

Sans-Scrotum is being crazy like a fox by saying stuff like this. I suspect he’s trying to intentionally sabotage his own chances at the nomination now in order to position himself for the 2016 election. He knows the GOP can’t win now, even if he should by an act of God get the nomination this time around (which he won’t, by the way).

But he’ll have 3 years to run around saying he gave it the good fight, knowing he won’t have an incumbent president to face in four years. He’s sure the country will take a decidedly reactionary turn over the next few years (which it will, by the way). That’s why he says stuff like this now (which can’t possibly appeal to independents) knowing that the base will do his bidding when he won’t have an unbeatable Obama on his hands.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I think it’s funny, though, that he’s angling for votes among evangelical Christians, the kind who used to say, ‘We don’t much like papists in these parts.’ Go figure.”


TWO:

[Regarding North Korea’s pending launch of a satellite-bearing rocket]:


According to the basic definitions below, North Korea would not be in violation of UN resolution. If it is attempting to orbit a satellite, that means the rocket involved can’t be suborbital. From Wikipedia:

“A ballistic missile is a missile that follows a sub-orbital ballistic flightpath with the objective of delivering one or more warheads to a predetermined target.” NOTE: If the objective is to deliver a warhead, but NK’s actual payload is a satellite, then the rocket involved would not be a “ballistic missile.”

“North Korea must ‘not conduct any further nuclear test or launch of a ballistic missile…’” NOTE: Again, by launching a satellite, NK wouldn’t be in violation.

Oh, I get it. The very idea that some other country could develop a missile that could reach the US is unnerving. Wait a minute! What about Israel? Oh, that’s right. No sweat. They’re an ally. Riigghhttt.. Tell that to the families of the dead crewmen of the USS Liberty.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“It’s always good to know who one’s friends are.”

THREE:

[RE: Moroccan teen forced to marry her rapist; her name was Amina al-Filali]

“…after being forced to marry the man who raped her.” Uh, does this “man” happen to have a name? The article saw fit to publish the victim’s name but not the rapist’s? It also doesn't mention that her family disowned her after she married this guy.

I’m not clear on how she was forced to marry this man. “He [again, I’d like the name) had sought to escape prison by invoking an article of the penal code that authorises the rapist to marry to escape prosecution.” Does that mean, “…marry the victim [as opposed to, say, a different woman] to escape prosecution?” And if it does, suppose the victim declines to marry her attacker – does that mean she ends up doing jail time herself or getting stoned for being a Limbaughian slut?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“The devil is not only in the details; he’s in the hearts of those who ‘spare us’ the details.”



FOUR:

“…[Santorum believes] that [the way] someone is going to get there is if the conservatives unite." Ah, Rick, but that’s the beauty of Compassionate Conservatism, isn’t it? Neither you nor Newt will drop out, so in the name of your own self-seeking and -glorification, you both are more than willing to sacrifice the conservative cause. If that isn’t the opposite of “compassion,” I don’t know what is.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“That whole Compassionate Conservative bit was just hokum from day one, and those promoting that concept knew so full well. That’s why I like calling Conservatives ‘cons’ – as in con men.”



FIVE:

Very soon – I’d say around Labor Day of this year – the US will attack Iran’s suspected nuke sites. And, be very clear about this part: Israel (by prior arrangement) will not take part in this attack. For if Israel were to go it alone, there would be at least one profound risk: What would Israel do if the Russians retaliated by launching missiles (non-nuke of course) at Israel’s Dimona reactor site?

Some might say, “In that case, Israel would launch a nuke or two at Moscow.” Weelll..bad idea – Russia would simply level the place, with the approval of much of the third world. And, if so, what would the US do? If Israel were to attack Russia in any way, Russia would surely have the right to retaliate (or “the right of self-defense,” as the Israelis like to say). Israel’s biggest problem would be Russia – not necessarily Iranian retaliation.

Obama would see our unassisted strike as a golden opportunity.  Americans are so weary of long wars in faraway places, they would be relieved (even jubilant) at a quick strike at Iran with no ground troops and no need for an exit strategy (simply because we would never have entered!). As a sweetener, not only will Obama attack military targets, but he’ll also target the personal assets of the ayatollahs – who are very wealthy and worldly men indeed.

For the record, I oppose any attack on Iran and I would lift the economic sanctions, if that were within my power.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"And what could the GOP prez nominee say after such an attack? Besides “duh,” that is?”



SIX:

[My response to two who responded to FIVE above]:

@ Idiot_Savant,

Dimona as a target has a lot of symbolic importance, in addition to its (officially unacknowledged) strategic importance. So this would make it a tempting target, even to a US eager to attack it secretly while blaming Russia (or somebody else) publicly. Don’t be too sure about what Russia may or may not do. I know Netanyahu has given this some thought. So should you – unless your handle is only half-right (and I wouldn’t bank on the “Savant” part being that half).


@ Stargazer46,

Where in the Bible does it say, as you claim, “[Russia] will lose all but maybe [one-fourth] of their military?” As for “The US is not mentioned in the last days” – there’s a lot that isn’t mentioned in the last days. You sound like just one more overblown, false prophet adding your own interpretation to the Bible (you know what’s supposed to happen to those folks, right?)

But there’s a larger issue here: There will be no End of Days, just as there never was a Creation or a Creating God. Get this out of your head once and for all. The universe always was and always will be. For the record, what you call “God” is busy working on His own self-perfection so that some day He can become a fully-enlightened Buddha. Much of the fault for the mess in the Middle East can be laid directly at His feet – more specifically, at the feet of His followers.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Russia isn’t the only entity that plays both sides of the fence.”

SEVEN:

“…says a suspicious Mr. Albright, ‘unfortunately the history of proliferation is just littered with countries lying about their intentions.’” Mr. Albright is suspicious? He’s concerned about countries (and presumably individuals) that lie? OK, Mr. Albright, answer these questions honestly:

Are you aware that any country that signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (as Iran did) can simply withdraw 90-days after stating its intention to do so in writing? And that written rationale isn’t subject to approval by any authority? Furthermore, after that 90-day period, such a country could openly build nukes without violating international law?

What say you, Mr. Albright? I direct your attention to Article X, Point 1 [of the NPT]. Read it and weep. Now, if you think it would still be okay to attack Iran after that 90-day period, that would say an awful lot about you, now wouldn’t it? I’m sure Israel wouldn’t be too concerned about that treaty; why should they be – they didn’t sign it?

Why am I the only one bringing up this Article X loophole? When I ran it by the Ron Paul campaign, I was greeted with stone silence. Maybe that tells us where Ron Paul is coming from, yes?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“[sigh] Not only do victors write the history books, they also decide which laws to ignore.”


EIGHT:

[I didn't post this to Yahoo News, though I should have...FYI: In Mississippi and Alabama it was a virtual dead heat among the 3 leaders]:

Romney finished just a shade behind Sans-Scrotum in Mississippi. And he virtually tied with Knute Gettin’-Rich in Alabama. I’d call that doing quite well, actually. As for Santy “sweeping” these two primaries, ha! He didn’t sweep all the delegates and that’s what counts. Romney has just added more to his slow but sure march to the nomination. I would say Romney’s pace is well in keeping with his business plan.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“At least Romney has a plan; Knute and Santy only have big mouths.”



NINE:

[This was in response to a US soldier murdering 17 Afghan civilians in their sleep]:

“But the incident highlights the enormous strain the country's beleaguered all-volunteer military force is under.” But that’s nothing compared to the karmic strain our country has yet to suffer for having gone into Afghanistan in the first place.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Sooner or later, karma demands its due; what we did to those people will come back to haunt us – on our own soil – in ways scarcely imaginable.”



TEN:

[My response to Sam C, who responded to NINE above]:

Sam C, Don’t be so sure about karma being a non-Christian tradition. Do a little research, dude, and stop showing off your ignorance.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I just love it when the yahoos pipe up, don’t you?”



ELEVEN:

Anybody who believes our troops went to Afghanistan to fight for our freedom is a fool. We went in seeking revenge for 9/11 - taking out on an entire country for what a handful of extremists did to us on ONE day. I fear there is no end to our blood lust; a decade of payback isn't enough.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"I still remember all the yahoos chanting when the B-52s hit - 'bomb 'em back to the stone age.' They cared nothing for freedom then, nor do they now."



TWELVE:

 [BK from Rockwall, Texas responded to ELEVEN above; to which I reply after his words]:

Steven you don't have a clue!! We didn't "take out an entire country", this is the country these extremists controlled and had numerous training camps that trained terrorists to attack the U.S. What would you have recommended that we did, kindly asked them to stop, asked the Taliban leaders if we could send a small elite force into the country to take them out, or maybe just take the liberal, peace waving, tree hugging view and just ignore it and hope it goes away!!! Terrorists don't just go away, their organizations just grows larger, just as Hitler did!!!


My response:

BK, you fail to understand what I meant by “taking out an entire country.” Of course, there are Afghans who are still alive and kicking, so I couldn’t have meant it in that sense. But their country, as a country (that is, as a sovereign state with power over its own destiny) has been effectively taken out. All this, while we gloat about giving them freedom under a warlord (Karzai) who cheated his way into the presidency, and who wouldn’t last a day without the US.

As for what you mean by “these extremists”: The Taliban controlled Afghanistan but they weren’t the ones responsible for 9/11 – al-Qaida was. Turning back the clock, the Taliban offered to turn bin Laden over to a third neutral country, if the US could provide proof he was responsible for 9/11. Don’t be too quick to say there was proof at that time, for even on our own FBI wanted posters for bin Laden, 9/11 wasn’t listed as one of his crimes. As the FBI put it at the time, “We don’t have proof he was responsible.”

My suggestion at the time: Bomb them with flowers, which would have shocked the world expecting us to go ballistic (which we did) with the level of our restraint. That’s another way of saying, we should have turned the other cheek. Ever hear of that, you being from the good Christian state of Texas?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I guess we reserve our Christianity for white fellers like us, yes?”



THIRTEEN:

[I didn't even try to post this since Yahoo wanted me to agree to extra terms of service. This is in reference to one US soldier killing 17 Afghan civilians]:


“U.S. strategy will not change ‘in reaction to a single event.’” That is, far be it for the actions of one man to dictate the actions of an entire nation. Oh wait a minute – we have exactly that situation in the person of our president. It’s amazing how many people fail to realize that one of our three branches of government is a One Man Branch.

We would never have invaded Iraq or Afghanistan if the vote of that one man would have been in the negative instead of the affirmative. I guess that gives the term “affirmative action” an entirely novel spin.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“The Constitution lists our three branches in order of importance – with the Congress coming first (Article I) and the President second (Article II). So we did we permit the Two Party System to reverse that? Come on, We the Sheeple, can anybody bleat me an answer to that?”



FOURTEEN:

“’… now you're going to make the argument, “I [Romney] should be president,” because of math,’ [Santorum] said on another.” That’s not the case at all. Look, Rick, I’ll spell it out for you: Romney will be nominated because he did the homework and planned in advance. Some people still call that “taking care of business.” And isn’t that what the GOP is supposed to be about – you know, being business friendly and all?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I hope Santy isn’t trying to say, ‘We should win because we’re so righteous.’”



FIFTEEN:

So Dan McGinnis, the author of the piece above, says “it’s one of the first things I do when I wake up in the morning” – that is “read what Ahmadinejad has to say.” Dude, if that’s true, you have way too much time on your hands. BTW, you’re not a “commentator” – you’re just another jingoist beatin’ them thar war drums, aren’t you Bubba?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Of course, ‘commentators’ like you won’t even touch this: If Iran were to formally withdraw from the Nuke Non-Proliferation Treaty, after a 90-day period it would have the internationally legally-recognized right to openly build nuclear weapons. What say you to that, Dan?”


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
Founder of The Independent Contractors’ Party

“I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to end up sitting around a campfire in the ruins of my hometown wondering why we didn’t try harder to stop the [man-made] apocalypse.”

Contact me at https://outlookweb.neiu.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=0d2aaf32a7c049acaf7fff340faee9f2&URL=mailto%3abpa_cinc%40yahoo.com