QUOTE*:
The Buddha said to the rakshasa daughters
“Excellent, excellent! If you can shield and guard those who accept and uphold
the mere name of the Lotus Sutra, your merit will be immeasurable. How much
more so if you shield and guard those who accept and uphold it in its entirety.”
:UNQUOTE.
That’s worth repeating: “the mere name of the Lotus
Sutra.” The mere name is “Myoho Renge Kyo,” which is its title in Japanese.
When the Buddha used the term “mere name,” he must have anticipated the coming
of the monk Nichiren who, basically, took that “mere name,” slapped the word
“Nam” in front of it, and then dubbed the result to be the basic law of the
universe.
Nichiren even went so far as to claim that saying
“Nam myoho renge kyo” once was the equivalent of reading the entire Lotus Sutra
once. Of course that’s utter nonsense for the same reason that saying the words
“War and Peace” once is equal to having read that Russian novel once.
Nichiren advocated the chanting of Nam Myoho Renge
Kyo and the daily recitation of the 2nd and 16th chapters
of the 28 chapter Lotus Sutra. The reading of the other chapters was not
advocated. So Nichiren basically positioned himself as the Votary of the Lotus
Sutra but not all of it – only the parts he deemed important.
And who was Nichiren (who was not a Buddha) to
contradict the Buddha Shakyamuni? In the Lotus Sutra, Shakyamuni repeats, over
and over, that appropriate Buddhist practice is to read, recite, ponder, and
teach to the best of your ability the Lotus Sutra. And not its “mere name” and
not only two of its chapters to be cherry picked by some future monk.
So,
who was Nichiren?
It’s not as important to ask that question as it is
to ask, “Why did Nichiren’s supporters make such extravagant claims about their
master?” Nichiren himself never claimed to be a buddha, which is remarkable
given the thousands of pages of written material which form his legacy. Others
took it upon themselves to claim that Nichiren was not only a Buddha, but was
the first Buddha – the Buddha of beginningless time.
However, all those who attain Buddhahood do so by
means of practicing the Lotus Sutra, as is claimed in the Lotus itself. So Nichiren
could not have become a Buddha without having engaged in that practice.
The implication is that Nichiren was always a
Buddha. But that sounds strange to me in light of his behavior during his life
in Japan, from his birth in 1222 to his death (from cancer!) in 1262.
There was a famous incident in which Nichiren was
led on horseback to be executed at Tatsunokuchi. On the way, he approached a
statue of Bodhisattva Hachiman and asked to halt there while he reminded this
Bodhisattva of his vow to protect the votaries of the Lotus Sutra. So there he
was – the mighty Nichiren – talking to a rock (that statue), when all he had to
do was use his supernatural powers (possessed by all buddhas) in order to save
himself. Apparently he forgot that it’s not possible to kill a buddha – which
is obvious since killing a buddha isn’t even listed as one of the five cardinal
sins of Buddhism.
Also, he overlooks the fact that a buddha only gives
the appearance of having a mortal body but in fact is (in a manner of speaking)
an immortal, impervious energy being who is a shapeshifter, who once upon a
time had a mortal body.
Or perhaps Nichiren might have called the name of
Bodhisattva Perceiver of the World’s Sounds for help. Perceiver has an entire
chapter in the Lotus Sutra detailing his powers to save living beings in
distress who merely once call out his name – it not being necessary to speak to
a statue carved in his (assumed) likeness.
Closing
remarks
In the Lotus Sutra, Shakyamuni speaks of attaining
wisdom that comes of itself – teacherless wisdom. In that spirit, I caution all
Buddhists to be very skeptical of claims made on behalf of great teachers – be they
the Dalai Lama or icons such as Nichiren Daishonin.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Steven
Searle, just another member of
the
Virtual Samgha of the Lotus and
former
candidate for US President (in 2008 & 2012)
Contact
me at
bpa_cinc@yahoo.com
Footnote:
QUOTE*: This quote is from page 352, from the Burton
Watson translation of The Lotus Sutra and Its Opening and Closing Sutras,
as published and copyrighted by the Soka Gakkai in 2009.
No comments:
Post a Comment