Showing posts with label Steven Searle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steven Searle. Show all posts

Sunday, December 4, 2011

US President’s Weekly Yahoo News Updates

Once per week, I consolidate comments I’d posted to recent articles appearing on Yahoo News. I share my views, written as if I actually were the US President. [I’m working on that.] The following were posted between Nov. 27 and today, though appear below in no particular order. As is my usual custom, if I open with a quoted item, that’s from the article itself.

I hope you enjoy all 15 of these mini-essays/comments.


ONE:

I just clicked on the Herman Cain for President website. There wasn’t any mention of him “suspending” his presidential campaign. There were, however, options to click on and “Join the Cain Train,” and to contribute. There was also an article posted by Cain on 12/01, entitled: “Ginger White: Another Loser Trying to Cash in.”

Also listed is a “private reception with photo op” scheduled for Dec. 5 in Oklahoma City…with a $250 minimum suggested contribution. How many will pay $250 to have their picture taken with Cain, without a colostomy bag over his head? Since his website is still open for business, will Cain insist on participating in future GOP candidate debates? I mean, he didn’t drop out, he just “suspended.”

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Even though Cain’s website brags, ‘[Cain] has never been fazed by what is expedient or easy…,’ it seems he was easily tempted by both.”


TWO:

Knew-it Gettin’-Rich vs. Barack Obama? Obama will win in a landslide after painting Gettin’-Rich as the personification of the insider, professional politician from the Party of No, who really believes it would take only 3 low-level nukes fired from a barge in the Gulf of Mexico to pump out enough EMP to completely paralyze the whole country. What a fool!

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“If the choice narrows down to Knew-It vs. Obama, the former Speaker wouldn’t be able to withstand the withering blast of reminders resurrected from his past brought to the entire country's attention.”


THREE:

 “… [Newt Gingrich’s] opponents, a slapstick lot….” Ron Paul & Jon Huntsman? Slapstick?

“But presidential campaigns are about character”… Knute Gettin’-Rich has character? People, especially female voters, could come to admire squeaky clean Romney as a personification of family values. Standing next to Knute, Mitt looks like a saint. Imagine that, Knute and Herman, a man who behaves himself, maritally speaking.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Joe Klein [the author of this article]? Or is it Joke Lyin’?"


FOUR:

Knute Gettin’-Rich, All American, promised on his website to sign this Executive Order (among others) on Day One:

“Respect Each Sovereign Nation’s Choice of its Capital. Each sovereign nation, under international law and custom, may designate its own Capital. Accordingly, the U.S. State Department should be instructed to respect the choice of each sovereign nation and place the American embassy in their Capital. (Israel is the only country the United States discriminates against in this regard. The people of Israel have designated Jerusalem as their capital. Yet the United States retains its embassy in Tel Aviv.)”

Knute is being disingenuous here. He could simply grant diplomatic recognition to Israel (even though it already has that status), but this time with this language, “The U.S. recognizes the state of Israel, Jerusalem being its capital, as the eternal homeland of the Jewish people (its Arab citizens be damned).” [Well, that IS where he’s coming from.]

Instead, Knute (All American) chooses to use an indirect route by claiming “the U.S. State Department should be instructed…” Instead he could choose the direct route by invoking the unique and unshared power of the President to grant diplomatic recognition. Is this an example of Gettin’-Rich’s bold leadership style – to hide behind the State Department?

Jerusalem doesn’t entirely belong to Israel, which is why we put our embassy in Tel Aviv in order to contest that claim. Israel has the right to choose its own capital. But we’re not obligated to endorse that decision. Besides, if Israel didn’t like our choice of Tel Aviv, they could have barred our embassy unless we placed it in Jerusalem. And Israel didn’t do that, now did it? So obviously Israel didn’t choose to invoke some mystic right that all embassies must be placed in a capital city.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I won’t kiss Israel’s butt like Gettin’-Rich; I will (on DAY ONE) completely void our recognition of Israel, granting that status to Palestine instead.”


FIVE:

Maybe Cain will make a defiant announcement [on Dec. 3], saying, "If Ginger White says I've had sex with her (off and on) for 13 years, she should be able to describe some of my intimate anatomical details. I say she won't be able to do that because...we never had sex!"

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"Wow, wouldn't that turn things around! At least somewhat. After all, he did admit giving her money."


SIX:

Why didn’t the interviewer cut to the chase by asking: “Since you had a 13-year affair with Herman Cain, you can surely give us some intimate details. Big or small? Circumcised or uncircumcised? Hangs to the left or to the right…or is he ambiDICKstrous?”

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I swear, the ‘journalists’ covering this case are as lame as the ones who never asked candidate Obama any hard questions back in 2007.”


SEVEN:

All Ginger White has to do is go public with details of Cain's anatomy. I'm absolutely amazed none of the media hounds has asked her, point blank, if she would consider doing this.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"I haven't seen any comments posted by Yahoo posters about this, though I have tried to bring it up twice before only to find - Yahoo censors again. Let's see if this post squeaks through." [This one did squeak through!]


EIGHT:

Independents can derail Newt Gettin’-Rich by simply asking for a GOP primary ballot and voting for someone else. Even Democrats could do that, since they won’t have to vote in any Democratic primaries (since Obama is running unopposed). Screw up the GOP primary, which is only fair considering how the GOP has screwed us for so long. By the way, this is perfectly legal.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“All the Occupy Wall Street types (and their legions of sympathizers) have to do is find structural weaknesses in the system and exploit those. Primary skewing sounds like a pretty good place to start.”


NINE:

If Gettin’-Rich becomes the nominee, compare his new Contract with America to mine. The biggest difference? My contract has teeth – if I don’t do what I promise, I forfeit the presidency via impeachment. Newt won’t do that. And I am only promising what I alone can actually deliver. Consider these elements from the contract I offered when running against Obama & McCain back in 2008 – elements I’m going to reintroduce:

ONE: Within 90 days of my inauguration, all U.S. military forces will be completely withdrawn from Afghanistan, regardless of the "situation on the ground." This withdrawal will also apply to any covert operatives in Iran.

TWO: There will be no military draft during my presidency. If Congress enacts a draft, however, I will encourage all draftees to be inducted. Immediately after induction, though, they will be subject to this blanket order: Do not follow any orders from any member of the military except this order from me, your Commander in Chief: "Carry on with your civilian lives as if you had never been drafted."

THREE: I will veto every single bill from Congress that comes my way until it passes a nationwide cap on personal credit card interest rates of 18%.

FOUR: Within 90 days of my inauguration, I will order all US personnel out of all facilities located at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This will allow Cuba to reoccupy that land, as is its sovereign right.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Here’s a new provision: I will void US diplomatic recognition of Israel and grant it, instead, to Palestine.”


TEN:

Suppose China has as many nukes as we do. So what? The US delivery system is far superior and has greater diversity. I still maintain, as I did in 2008 when I ran against Obama and McCain, that we only need 1,000 nukes tops.

Can anyone blame the Chinese for being secretive? When we have people like Newt Gettin’-Rich publicly declaring that covert (and deniable) activity against Iran should be initiated, China knows that would also include them. They know what we’re capable of. Not to worry, though. China won’t do anything militarily since that might upset their inexorable march toward economic dominance. That’s the real way they hope to come out on top.

As for this “professor” and his student researchers – please. Talk about Chinese tunnels has been going around for at least 10 years – in the public press. If anything, I rather suspect this “professor” and his group benefitted from input provided by our own government.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“You can fool some of the people some of the time…but I’m pretty hard to fool, so stop embarrassing yourselves by trying.”


ELEVEN:

Stock markets will have their ups and downs. But they’ll tend to stay up if the EU and the US carry out two plans:

ONE:  to prevent the emergence of a Pan-Islamic Union (called by some “a new Caliphate”);

TWO: to continue to sow the seeds of African disunity.

The reasons are the same in both cases: Neither the US nor the EU (nor China, for that matter) wants to see the emergence of a new industrial economy that could threaten their market shares. The Elite view some nations as consumers, some as producers, and others as providers of raw materials never to be allowed to industrialize. Why do you think Obama recently sent 100 troops to Africa? That was part of a larger, on-going plan to expand our undermining influence in the Dark Continent.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“To my African brothers: The US is not your friend, nor are the Chinese and Euros. In their view, it’s best that you don’t forget your place.”


TWELVE:

Herman Cain is a sham candidate acting as a set-up man to make Romney look good. Think about it. Surely Cain didn’t think his skeletons would stay in their closets. I suspect that from the very beginning Cain wasn’t a serious candidate but (shall we say?) an enabler for a higher (GOP) power.

As for Knew-It Gettin’-Rich, he wasn’t a sham candidate – at least not by intention but he too will serve that function. Standing next to former Speaker Gettin’-Rich and (especially) next to Cain, the squeaky clean Romney will start looking awfully good to a lot of people. A lot more than just the fundie Christians who might go with Romney, since he seems to personify family values.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“However, I can’t explain why the latest Cain detractor doesn’t offer some intimate details, since she must have seen a lot of Herman in 13 years.”


THIRTEEN:

"For the Muslim Brotherhood, democracy is a useful means of coming to power, but not a valued end state." That’s funny – our own Dem/Pub axis feels the same way about our own “democracy.”

We don’t have a democracy here – we have a “constitutional republic” (or actually a union of such republics). Our leaders don’t like democracy – for if they did, the Senate filibuster couldn’t exist (we’d have one man, one vote). Democracy can only work if you have an informed and participating citizenry – which we don’t (we simply go through the motions of picking from choices forced upon us).

The most ideal form of government is an enlightened monarchy. And a large number of Republicans support that notion, since they can’t wait for Jesus to return and rule over us. So…’nuff said about democracy.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Say, you don’t suppose we’re afraid that Muslim Brotherhood might be pissed at us for having armed and trained Mubarak’s forces to suppress them for decades, do you?”


FOURTEEN:

“… as a drug-fueled civil war now rages in Mexico.” That’s according to the Newt for Prez website. “civil war now rages in Mexico?” Is this guy nuts or merely given to hyperbole? Yes, there’s a drug-war going on but that can’t be called a civil war. I’m going to send Knew-It Gettin’Rich (at last) a dictionary.

Even worse than not knowing what a civil war is, is Knew-Its fondness for alternative histories. This is a man who loves indulging (literally) in fantasy. Let’s hope, if elected, he knows where the borders of La-La Land end and Real Nations’ begin. One fantasy that he supports is the “threat” of a pending EMP attack, as in the book One Second After to which he contributed (movie deal went bust, though). I rip that delusion to shreds here: Google: EMP threat bogeyman Gingrich Searle.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Gingrich may have a PhD in history and have an arm chair quarterback's love of the military (never served), but that doesn’t mean he’s fit to lead our future.”


FIFTEEN:

“…[Newt Gingrich campaigns in a] wealthy conservative stronghold [in Florida]…” Ah, a bunch of rich white people waiting to see the Great White Hope (Knew-it Gettin’Rich). They be chomping at the bit for him to oust that black feller currently at 1600. Get down with your homies, Mr. Speaker. Enjoy it while it lasts, which won’t be for long. Then voters will remember why they soured on you back in the day.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Knew-it Gettin’Rich personifies what’s wrong with DC culture, but some folks love livin’ in the past and reminisin’ about when people knew their place.”

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
Founder of The Independent Contractors’ Party

“Since Newt Gingrich is the latest GOP flavor-of-the-month, I promise to do my homework, read what he has to say, and proceed to rip him to shreds. [sigh] This is too easy. Why can’t the GOP give me a real challenge?”


Contact me at bpa_cinc@yahoo.com

Tags:

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Murdering a defenseless ram

I speak in defense of the ram, which Abraham slaughtered instead of his son Isaac. I say “slaughtered” since I can’t see how, in any way, this act could have been considered a sacrifice.


The Binding of Isaac

QUOTE: According to the biblical story, Abraham sets out to obey God's command without questioning but does not state in front of Isaac that he is the intended sacrifice... After Isaac is bound to an altar, the angel of God stops Abraham at the last minute, saying "now I know you fear God." At this point Abraham sees a ram caught in some nearby bushes and sacrifices the ram in Isaac's stead. :UNQUOTE. [source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_of_Isaac ]

You should click the link (above) to the interesting Wikipedia article on this subject. Different points of view are expressed as to the meaning of this story, but nothing at all is said of the injustice of killing a defenseless animal (and, adding insult to injury, calling that a sacrifice).

Nobody speaks for that long-dead ram, but I will…here and now. Had I been present, perhaps hiding behind some burning bushes watching a hideous old man about to delusionally murder his son, I would have stepped forth (after what seemed to be an angel stopped Abraham but before Abraham murdered the ram), saying:

“Stop! Do not kill that ram. Did God demand that you kill such a defenseless creature? Perhaps He placed it there as a test of your mercy, a test you’re about to fail. For sacrifice is always of the self. By killing that ram, or even by having killed your son, how would that have been your sacrifice? You wish to please the Lord? Then behave yourself. No Lord could possibly ask more from his subjects than that.

“Whatever commanded you to sacrifice Isaac and stands in silence as you approach the ram to slaughter, is not the Lord God, Creator of the Universe.”


More on killing the animals

From the Bible (1 Samuel 15:3), we have this little gem which claims the Lord God commanded as follows:

“Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

Then of course there was the grosser example of the Great Flood, during which innocent animals were allowed to drown.

Again, whatever Force mandated these premature deaths was not the Lord God, Creator of the Universe.


Conclusion

I have a good friend who is a staunch supporter of animal rights but who also follows his Savior, shunning all churches. I myself eat meat, so I was not as sympathetic as he. But as I listened, I gained a bit of sympathy. My friend was quick to point out, the Bible has been corrupted and is not even remotely similar to the truth. At worst, it’s been infiltrated by devils. At best, it’s been rendered meaningless by “well-intended” propagandists. Which means, exactly what?

It means now what it’s always meant: “Not all of us receive visits from the Lord, nor could most of us be that sure, ‘that’s the Lord.’ Therefore? You’ve got to figure things out for yourself and act accordingly. And don’t be afraid to say, ‘I don’t know.’”

As for Abraham: when commanded by the Lord to sacrifice Isaac, he should have simply said, "I have free will, right? Okay, I hereby exercise my 'free will option' by telling You, I won't sacrifice Isaac." Abraham failed us all by not saying this, which is a failure that has echoed down through the ages and affects us to this very day.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
Founder of The Independent Contractors’ Party

“Sacrifice is always of the self and is not commanded. Don’t let anyone tell you differently.”

Contact me at bpa_cinc@yahoo.com

Sunday, November 13, 2011

US President’s Comments on Herman Cain




I am posting these Comments on Herman Cain, which I had posted on Yahoo News over the past week. I usually post a weekly compilation of my Yahoo News comments. But I had written so extensively on this GOP wannabe, I want to dedicate this particular blog to him. Within an hour, I will post my usual Yahoo News Weekly Updates.


I hope you enjoy all 13 of these mini-essays/comments.


ONE:

Prediction: Herman Cain will drop out of the race. But not for any honest, manly reason. He'll weasel out by (falsely claiming), "This is taking too much of a toll on my wife." [Gloria Cain had a pacemaker implanted. So it could be crudely put that, should Herman decide to quit, he’d have a built-in reason for doing so.]

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"Translation? Cain just can't take the heat."



TWO:

[I tried twice in succession to post this but came up empty both times.]

“Presidential candidate Herman Cain has joked about creating electrified border fences to kill illegal immigrants…” Cain had also “joked” about how his father threatened a rich, white man with a gun. Only thing is, the gun was real. And Cain can’t deny this, because it’s in his most recent book, This is Herman Cain. It most certainly is, and I’m not joking.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Google these words for the story that the media is ignoring: Searle Herman Cain audacity.”




THREE:

Suppose those evil, librul Dems are behind this. They might not be trying to swiftboat Cain – though I much prefer the term “high tech lynching.” Maybe they’re trying to rile up the riff-raff GOP into a state of self-righteous indignation (they’re so good at that!) to the point where they’ll rally around Cain. And maybe that’s what the Dems want, since they know they can beat Cain easily.

Oh, did I mention? There’s a 264-word passage in Cain’s book about how his father threatened a rich, white man with a gun – a story (as Cain wrote) that he found funny. Somehow, I don’t think pulling a gun on somebody (“jokingly,” in Cain’s words) is funny – especially since Cain’s dad threatened that man. Or will Cain fail to remember that he put that in the book? [“Must be the fault of my editor, who I just found out is a Democrat!”]

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Google these words for my analysis of those 264 words: Searle Cain audacity.”



FOUR:

[One of the Cain accusers suggested she would consider voting for Cain for president.]

Maybe the better question would have been: “Would you consider voting for Herman Cain if he admitted to the allegations AND apologized to you?” But, you know how it goes, in the context of a live interview, the journalist didn’t happen to think of the better question. That might explain Bialek’s response, which should have been: “I hope that he admits what he did and apologizes.” But, you know how it goes, in the context of a…

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Of course, Cainophiles will insist her willingness to consider voting for a repentant Cain is proof that she’s screwy.”



FIVE:

“[Cain] said he would be willing to take a lie detector test if he had a good reason.” And what would constitute a good reason? Did anyone think to press Cain on that or were they afraid he'd say, “This interview is over?”

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Google these words: Searle Cain audacity.”



SIX:

Richard posted: “While sexual harassment certainly exists, the public should not overlook the fact that many of the allegations made are by hysterical kooks.” And this post, on-line for all of 6 hours, managed to snag 738 thumbs-up vs. 22 thumbs-down.

First of all, congrats to Richard who is, I’m sure, a loyal Yahoo employee who is “programmed” to receive volumes of hits from phantoms. [Or maybe Richard himself is a phantom.] Must be phantoms involved because his sentence is meaningless. No real person could possibly thumbs-up such vagueness. To wit, what you mean by “many” paleface?

I can counter Richard with equal ambiguity: “There are many cases of sexual harassment out there that don’t get reported (in fact, I’ll venture to say it’s the majority of such cases) because victims are afraid for their jobs or think they’ll lose a he-said vs. she-said case.”

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“When are We-the-Yahoo-Consumers going to give the middle finger to such stupid posts?”



SEVEN:

Press conference, eh? Will Cain actually do more than read from a prepared statement – Lord knows he shouldn’t try to ad lib this. Will a reporter ask, “Mr. Cain, Mr. Cain, are you willing to take a lie detector test if your accuser also agrees to do so?” If so, I hope his staff adequately prepped him for such a question. I wouldn't want to see Cain get all sweaty and nervous and start lashing out (bad form, you know). Herman seems to have a lot of “blame the victim” in him. If he becomes our next president, guess what? He’ll be blaming everybody but himself…including you!

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I have no evidence to support this [which is how Cain has opened more than once], but I believe he’s a serial groper. More than 4 will step forward.”



EIGHT:

Cain’s response was laughable [during the most recent GOP debate] – the part where he said, “The American people deserve better than someone being tried in the court of public opinion based on unfounded accusations…”

Herman Cain thinks he’s “someone being tried in the court of public opinion based on unfounded accusations.” Therefore, Herman Cain (in effect) had said, “The American people deserve better than me.”

As for “unfounded accusations,” that remains to be seen. I imagine the GOP brass must be biting their fingernails waiting for that other shoe to drop. You know…that fifth woman, that sixth woman, some waiter who remembers having seen Cain having dinner with someone he doesn’t (choose to) remember. And that “other shoe” could come at the most inopportune time – say, right after Cain gets nominated.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“What the American people really deserve is someone who can manage to properly construct a sentence, thereby saying what he means.”




NINE:

To the author of this article, Saul Relative: You might be “relative” in everybody else’s eyes. But in my eyes, you’re relatively lame. From what I can see, Donna Donella is trying to paint a picture, by reporting what she saw. As BryanT already noted, “if you’re married and are asking women who you don’t know to dinner, you’re doing something wrong.” Your headline included this: “…She Isn’t Accusing Herman Cain of Anything – but Isn’t She?” Here, let me spell it out for you: She isn’t accusing Cain of harassment, but she is accusing him (by means of the picture she’s painting) of behavior unbecoming a married man.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Come on, Yahoo. Why do you permit such bad writing to fly under your banner?”



TEN:

[Two posts to the same article about God telling Cain to run for the presidency.]


ONE:

Mark my words: These words are the mark of Cain. Does nobody else see this?

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
"Cain is so full of himself, there isn't any room left for the Holy Spirit. So, no, God did not talk to Cain."



TWO:
"And when I finally realized that it was God saying that this is what I needed to do, I was like Moses. 'You've got the wrong man, Lord. Are you sure?'

"How did Cain finally realize it was God saying this? The Lord [of Darkness] didn’t get the wrong man; Cain got the wrong Lord. Problem is: Too few people question such revelations. Even in the Bible, God is cited as telling Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. Listen up, good people, that wasn’t the Lord Creator of the Universe that did that. Abraham got it wrong and should have said, “’Lord,’ if you want him, You take him; You shall not have him by my own hands.”

Then there was that bit about Noah’s flood. Also not caused by God. I know an animal advocate who said, “No God would have killed all of those innocent animals just to punish wicked mankind.” All He had to do was will the wicked out of existence (poof, and they're gone) - kind of like a Holy Neutron Bomb that kills only the wicked but spares everything else. He is God, after all, so He must be able to do this.

More than one “God” managed to find His way into the Bible, but that doesn’t make all of them holy. I’m thinking of the jealous God, the angry God, and the God who gave the okay for the Chosen People to kill the unchosen and their animals.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I’m proud to be the only Buddhist running for the presidency; I’m happy not to have all that God baggage.”



ELEVEN:

If the allegations weren’t true, then why were these women paid off? Back when this was supposed to have happened, it was hard to prove a sexual harassment accusation. In any event, Cain is handling this rather badly. Wonder how he’d react as POTUS to that famous 3 AM phone call his aides bring him in the middle of a sound sleep.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“Cain seems testy, petty, whiny, belittling, and guilty as [hell].”



TWELVE:

“[Cain] told Fox he thought his race influenced the decision to take the allegations public.‘I believe the answer is yes, but we do not have any evidence to support it,’ he said.”

You’re going to be hearing a lot of that from Cain – “I believe…[without] any evidence.” That’s a dangerous trait in a president. Know what I believe? Cain isn’t an “American black conservative” – he’s just a plain old con man.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“No, Mr. Cain, the decision to make the allegations public had nothing to do with your race. It had to do with considerations of character. And character counts, wouldn’t you say?”



THIRTEEN:

How is Herman Cain similar to a can of Coca-Cola? They’re both brown, empty of content, effervescent, and will explode all over the place if shaken. I picked Coca-Cola in honor of Herman Cain’s father, who provided years of loyal service to that company as the CEO’s chauffeur.

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
“I posted on the Cain Mystique. Google these words: Steven Searle US President 2012.”


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle for US President in 2012
Founder of The Independent Contractors’ Party

“Herman Cain’s supporters cling so fiercely to him for much the same reason Joe Paterno’s supporters are so loyal – not a whole lot of thinking going on there” – Steve.

Contact me at bpa_cinc@yahoo.com