Tuesday, August 26, 2014

"Begin Again," a Buddhist movie starring Keira Knightley and Mark Ruffalo

My Thesis:

"Begin Again" is a very Buddhist movie, but in a stealth kind of way. There were two songs in particular in this movie which I will analyze to prove my point. I will provide the lyrics to each, but will only number most of the lines. Then I will follow the lyrics with my analysis.

But first, give these songs a listen using these links. They're simply beautiful:


This first is a bouncy little tune called "Coming up Roses:"

The second is quite the opposite - very poignant: "Lost Stars:"


Disclaimer: I don't mind admitting I was very smitten with this movie, having seen it three times in one week at the local theater.


The primary characters:
  • Keira Knightley as Gretta, an amateur but talented songwriter and soon-to-be-ex-girlfriend of Dave Kohl, who's a recording artist about to hit it big by recording an album based on music he'd recorded for a successful movie.


  • Mark Ruffalo as Dan Mulligan, record company exec who is "instrumental" in recording an album based on the lyrics written by Gretta. His knack for orchestration adds a huge musical sophistication to Gretta's powerful lyrics.

  • Adam Levine as Dave Kohl.

  • James Corden as Steve, Gretta's best friend who has been living in New York as a struggling musician when Gretta looks him up upon her arrival.

"Coming up Roses"

"Coming Up Roses," sung by Keira Knightley

(1) When you were asleep
(2) And I was out walking,
(3) The voices started to speak
(4) And they wouldn't stop talking.
(5) There were signs all around,
(6) It really got my mind racing.
(7) You were right all along
(8) Something's gotta change
(9) Hold on, Hold on, they're not for me.
(10) Hold on, cause everything's coming up...roses...roses.

(11) Now we're back on the street,
(12) For a song that's worth singing.
(13) The bloody nose of defeat,
(14) While your victory bell's ringing.
(15) My whole life's turned around
(16) For this thing you keep chasing.
(17) You were right all along,
(18) But it's me who's got to change.
(19) Hold on, Hold on, they're not for me.
(20) Hold on, Cause everything's coming up...roses.

(Hold on, Hold on) Aaahhh
(Hold on, Hold on) Aaahhh
(Hold on, Hold on) (Hold on, Hold on) Aaahhh
(Hold on, Hold on) Aaahhh (Hold on, Hold on) Aaahhh
(Hold on, Hold on)

Hold on, Hold on, they're not for me.
Hold on, cause everything's coming up... Roses.

(21) (Everything's coming up roses, Everything's coming up roses,
(22) Hold on, Hold on) Roses (Hold on, Hold on, Everything's coming up,
(23) Hold on, Hold on, Everything's coming up,
(24) Hold on, Hold on) Roses (Hold on, Hold on)...

(25) Roses


My thoughts:

Before my literal analysis, I just want to say that this bouncy, upbeat little tune was a breath of fresh air. Knightley's voice is perfect for this - she can carry a tune and has some nice flourishes but (as she admits) she's really not a singer and had to undergo some training to do what she did here. Still, her clear and confident rendering in an almost-girl-next-door way made this song very poignant.

Line 1: The "you" being referred to throughout this song is Gretta's best friend, Steve, at whose humble abode she crashes after walking out on her cheating boyfriend. In the movie, it's easy to regard Steve as somewhat of a clownish character who genuinely, unselfishly cares about Gretta. But as this song will show, he's deceptively far from that. The name "Steve" by the way means "crown, wreath, victorious." And the name "Gretta" means "pearl" or "child of light" - see Footnote 1.

Line 1: "When you were asleep" - even great teachers have to sleep sometime, which is when their assistants continue with the lessons - lines 3 & 4:

(3) The voices started to speak
(4) And they wouldn't stop talking.

So what were those voices actually saying? I think: "Trust this music exec who looks like a bum. He really seems to believe in you," and "it's you who has to change - so stop blaming the boyfriend who just cheated on you."

(5) There were signs all around,
(6) It really got my mind racing.

     As for these "signs," they could have been as leading and specific as in the movie "I Origins," when frequent and unusual occurrences of the number 11 lead Dr. Ian Gray to a billboard that, in turn, leads him to his wife of a former lifetime. Or these "signs" could simply have been the whole world suddenly looking like a much cheerier and hopeful place than it had seemed not so long ago.

Lines 7 & 8, and 17 & 18, summarized in line 18: "But it's me [Gretta] who's got to change."

    That's a huge Buddhist theme: "If you want your external circumstances to change - especially the negative things that come your way - you've got to change first (that is, become more enlightened)." Put another way: "All change starts from within."

Lines 9 & 10: "They're not for me" refers to the roses which represent Gretta's turn of fortune after she starts recording her album with Dan Mulligan's help. This is a bit complicated, so bear with me. Yes, in one sense, the roses are for her but they're a mixed blessing. Roses are beautiful but they have thorns - so one could say all earthly desires which are fulfilled (success, recognition, wealth) may be considered to be beautiful things but have downsides as well (thorns) unless the recipient of good fortune has "changed" as referred to in line 18.

When Gretta says, "They're not for me," she means, "They're not what I really long for." I think she really wants another kind of flower - the Lotus Flower, which is a Buddhist symbol of enlightenment. The roses are nice - most people would be ecstatic to see "everything's coming up roses" in their lives. But Gretta longs for a better, more meaningful flower in the form of the Lotus. This is explained in lines 15 & 16:


(15) My whole life's turned around
(16) For this thing you keep chasing.

This "thing you keep chasing" is Steve's persistent search for enlightenment, which he has tried over the years to share with Gretta. He succeeds when she claims, "My whole life's turned around [by the power of] this thing you keep chasing."

There's an interesting point in the movie when Steve is preparing a couch for Gretta to sleep on, and he asks her on which end she wants the pillow placed. She's noncommittal, but I think it's important that he's that deferential to her and is trying to get her to think about such things. Most people don't think about this at all, but sleep positioning is very important.

Another interesting point is the odd positioning of Steve's own bed - it's so high up, he'd practically have to be able to fly to reach it (hmm, food for thought, since highly accomplished bodhisattvas are able to do exactly that, though he is wise enough not to give Gretta a demonstration, making up some barely plausible explanation as to how he manages to get to his bed).

[This comment I added on March 22: I was surprised at the large collection of musical instruments in Steve's apartment. Gretta noticed this and mentioned it to Steve, who said he got them at super bargain prices from studios which were upgrading and had to get rid of current inventory. But I had a thought: Even though Steve was a solo street musician, while alone in his apartment he could play with an orchestra using the instruments he had lying around. In the Lotus Sutra, it mentions instruments that play themselves not needing a musician to play them. This gives further proof that Steve is a highly-advanced Bodhisattva, though his humble nature hides this identity.]

[NOTE: Line 15 is unclear the way Gretta sings it, but the on-line sources all say it should read: "My whole life's turned around." But...those are the same sources that incorrectly render line (13), as I'm about to point out below.]

(11) Now we're back on the street,
(12) For a song that's worth singing.
     The "song that's worth singing" is this very song ("Coming up Roses") since it is so laden with meaning that can benefit so many people. They are "on the street" recording it with the band Dan has cobbled together. As for "Now we're back on the street," I think Steve, as a street musician in NYC, was also that back home in England. And he had coaxed Gretta back then, who really wasn't a performer, to join him to overcome her shyness.

(13) The bloody nose of defeat,
(14) While your victory bell's ringing.
     Gretta bears the "bloody nose of defeat" by having failed to see the immaturity of her ex-boyfriend, while Steve's "victory bell [is] ringing," by virtue of the fact that Gretta finally "gets it" - I've got to change. By the way, all of the on-line lyrics sources I checked render line (13) as "The blur that knows a defeat." But when listening to the song as it's performed in the movie (and on YouTube), what's really being sung is "The bloody nose of defeat."

[I just hate it when on-line sources don't get it right.]

Lines 20 through 24 (including the unnumbered lines) feature children singing (the parts in parentheses). In the movie, the children were innocent (wink, wink) bystanders who were nearby playing basketball so noisily that the quality of the recording of this song was threatened. So Dan walks over to negotiate with them - trying at first to bribe them with money and cigarettes. Then he asks them, "Say? Can you sing?" Next thing we see, the five or six kids are huddled around a microphone singing point/counterpoint with Gretta.

Of course, no 8- or 9-year-old child is going to be singing, with any kind of believable authority, "hold on" in the usual sense which means "hang in there." But they could well be reinforcing for Gretta her own wish to "hold on [to the hope of obtaining the Lotus Flower]."

(22) Hold on, Hold on) Roses (Hold on, Hold on, Everything's coming up,
(23) Hold on, Hold on, Everything's coming up,

    I thought it was a nice touch that the line "Everything's coming up" (sung by some of the kids) is interrupted by "Hold on, Hold on" (sung by the other kids). This is an elegant way of saying "hold on" for the Lotus Flowers, that it shouldn't automatically be assumed that "everything" that comes up will only be roses.

As a Buddhist, I saw those children as being protective entities who "happened" to be playing basketball but were really there in support of Steve's mission to help his best friend.

Line (25): "Roses" This is spoken by Gretta almost sadly, as if saying, "Roses aren't good enough."

I walked away from this bouncy little tune thinking, "Gretta's going to be alright."


"Lost Stars"
UPDATE: This link has a far better interpretation of "Lost Stars," but I won't delete this earlier material (below) since it has some merit:

http://ind4prez2012.blogspot.com/2014/09/lost-stars-revisited.html

"Lost Stars," - the version sung by Keira Knightley, though Adam Levine also sang a version in the movie - with almost-but-not-quite the same lyrics (which turns out to be important). 

(1) Please don't see just a girl caught up in dreams and fantasies.
(2) Please see me reaching out for someone I can't see.
(3) Take my hand, let's see where we wake up tomorrow.
(4) Best laid plans sometimes are just a one night stand.
(5) I'll be damned, Cupid's demanding back his arrow.
(6) So let's get drunk on our tears and
(7) God, tell us the reason, youth is wasted on the young.
(8) It's hunting season,
(9) and this lamb is on the run searching for meaning.
(10) But are we all lost stars trying to light up the dark?
(11) Who are we? Just a speck of dust within the galaxy?
(12) 'Woe is me' if we're not careful turns into reality.
(13) Don't you dare let our best memories bring you sorrow.
(14) Yesterday I saw a lion kiss a deer.
(15) Turn the page, maybe we'll find a brand new ending.
(16) Where we're dancing in our tears and
(17) God, tell us the reason, youth is wasted on the young.
(18) It's hunting season,
(19) and this lamb is on the run, searching for meaning.
(20) But are we all lost stars trying to light up the dark?
(21) I thought I saw you out there crying.
(22) I thought I heard you call my name.
(23) I thought I heard you out there crying.
(24) But just the same,
(25) God, tell us the reason, youth is wasted on the young.
(26) It's hunting season,
(27) and this lamb is on the run, searching for meaning.
(28) But are we all lost stars trying to light up the dark?
(29) Are we all lost stars trying to light up the dark?

My thoughts:

I was amazed to learn that songwriting credit for this piece was shared by four different people. That must have been some fine-toothed comb they used when crafting these lyrics.

This song is "our song" - that is, written by Gretta for her boyfriend before their breakup in the States, back when they were living in England. So this song predates "Coming up Roses."

There's a lot in this song that is just lyrically fantastic, but lines (28) and (29) gave me pause:
(28) But are we all lost stars trying to light up the dark?
(29) Are we all lost stars trying to light up the dark?

This might be the scientist within me speaking, but there is no such thing as a "lost star." All of the stars in the heavens are where they are supposed to be due to strict and inviolable laws of physics. Now, anyone who's read Stanislaw Lem's "Solaris" - which features a planet with a will of its own that can violate its orbital path supposedly "dictated" by its proximity to a twin star system - will disagree with me. So I will admit this much: If a star has a will, then it can end up "lost." Otherwise, it's where it's supposed to be due to factors it has no will nor power to control.

Also, stars don't "try...to light up the dark." They merely give off their light, which (over time) reduces their substance until they are a much-reduced shell of their former selves.

However, if Steve is able to share with Gretta the Buddhist "bible" known as "The Lotus Sutra," she will read about the Buddha being able to emit a beam of light from between his eyebrows which lights up 18,000 Buddha worlds in the eastern direction, making visible to the Great Assembly all of the activities taking place there and allowing them to hear all of the words being spoken in all of those places.

That is what an Enlightened One can do - which Gretta and any other seeker of the Way can also do, as revealed in "The Lotus Sutra." With one important difference: Giving off light depletes a star, whereas the light given off by a Buddha, which helps to enlighten others, doesn't "deplete" the Buddha at all.

Line 2: "Please see me reaching out for someone I can't see." Of course, she can "see" her boyfriend Kohl, but not entirely - not for all of what he is, which includes the weakness that made him cheat on her later.

Line (5): "I'll be damned, Cupid's demanding back his arrow."

     Judging by how their relationship ended, looks like Cupid was on to something here, seeing what Gretta couldn't see. Looks like Cupid was acting in the role of a Buddhist protective entity. Gretta's response? Line (6): "So let's get drunk on our tears..." Tears blind people, but sometimes people in love (or who are heavily infatuated) prefer such blindness. Much to their later sorrow.

Line (9): "and this lamb is on the run searching for meaning."

     Adam Levine's version is "and the lambs are on the run..." He pluralizes "lambs" and, I think, removes himself from their group. His version of this song and hers are as different as night and day. He goes into vocal acrobatics toward the end trying to wow an adoring audience, while to her this song is something highly personal. Tell you what: If my girlfriend had written this song for me, I'd have a lot of questions to ask and praises to offer.

(8) It's hunting season,
(9) and this lamb is on the run searching for meaning.

     It's a nice touch to see such a role-reversal - for lambs to be doing the hunting. And the "hunting" isn't to end in a killing but in an obtaining of meaning.


(14) Yesterday I saw a lion kiss a deer.

(15) Turn the page, maybe we'll find a brand new ending.
If you saw a lion kiss a deer - even if only in your mind - then you're quite the visionary. But as for finding a brand new ending, you can't just "turn the page" - you've got to write that ending yourself. That's what "Coming up Roses" meant in its line, "But it's me who's got to change." If you just "turn the page," you'll only find the ending that someone else wrote.

Final note:

I was glad to see that this movie ranked #73 for the year. Too bad the POS called "The Expendables 3" came in at #57, but what are you gonna do? The battle against bad taste, though, will become more winnable if more movies like "Begin Again" appear on the scene. Stats are according to Box Office Mojo, as of today (8/26/14)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle, Just another member of the
Virtual Samgha of the Lotus and
Former Candidate for USA President (in 2008 & 2012)


Footnotes:


Footnote 1:

Ancient Persians thought that pearls were formed when oysters came to the water’s surface to look at the moon, and a drop of dew formed in their shells which was turned to pearl by the moon's beams. This romantic story has given the meaning ‘Light's Creation’ to the names [Gretta/Greta]:



Contact me at bpa_cinc@yahoo.com

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

"The Expendables: 3" and beyond

Sly Stallone is at it again. It's bad enough he did a number 1 and a number 2 on us (pissing and shitting on us, as it were, on his way to a couple of million extra bucks). But he's got a number 4 and 5 in the works, as well as a #3 currently showing. If #1 and #2 are pissing and shitting, I shudder to think what 3, 4 and 5 will end up standing for. Not to mention, an all-female force calling themselves the ExpendaBelles is in the works as a spinoff. I wish I was kidding.

It's not fair, though, to single out Sly as the sole villain here. He had plenty of willing accomplices - Schwarzenneger, Willis, Lundgren, Norris, Van Damme, to name a few of the actors. And us - that's right, those of us who love being abused so badly and paying ticket prices for the privilege.

My biggest objection? None of the good guys gets killed or even seriously wounded...well, there might have been one "death." But the overall impression the moviegoer walks away with is, "If we had more elite teams like this, we could kick ass the world over and not have to tolerate long, drawn-out wars like those in Afghanistan and Iraq." And this: "With sufficient training, our guys become bullet proof." There are people who think this way - people who need to be seriously coaxed into reality.

Toward that end, I'd like to see an anti-movie with this title: "The Expendables: In Bits and Pieces." Using the same big name actors, show them in a North Korean ambush getting arms and legs blown off but still living. The enemy then takes them to a hospital to recover and also to remove any uninjured arms and legs, leaving only torsos with heads still attached to be returned to the States to listen to speeches as they receive their medals.

Oh, one more thing. Kim Jong-un is wearing a special necklace as he invites the US President to "negotiate in good faith now that your eunuchs who tried to assassinate me have been neutralized." That "special necklace" bears the bronzed penises of all of the Expendables team members.

(sigh) I don't normally indulge in such horrible fantasies. But I can't help but wonder the same thing Sly Stallone must have wondered when he started his career - "I wonder how much of a market there could be for what I have to offer." To be sure, there's probably at least a niche market for just about anything. But as for appearing in mainstream US movie theaters - the owners would probably fear their businesses would be firebombed by right wingers not in the mood. Or at a minimum - they might worry that sales of popcorn etc at their concession stands might take a hit.

Then there's the practical issue: Could you get any of the original Expendables actors to end up as "bits and pieces?" Perhaps at least a few of them - if the paycheck was made attractive enough.

And then there's the worst possible response to such a "Bits and Pieces" movie: Our doctors rehab the limbless Expendables using bionic technology, even creating mechanical penises for them! And they return to North Korea and single-handedly destroy their entire military. And, yes, there are people who think such an outcome would be possible.

I suppose for every thesis, there's an antithesis. But when does it stop?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle, Just another member of the
Virtual Samgha of the Lotus and
Former Candidate for USA President (in 2008 & 2012)


Contact me at bpa_cinc@yahoo.com









Monday, August 11, 2014

Moshe Feiglin's attempt at ethnic cleansing


Introduction

I'm going to reprint below the entire letter sent to Israeli PM Netanyahu on Aug. 1, 2014 by Moshe Feiglin. Feiglin is a newcomer to the Israeli parliament (the Knesset), having been elected on January 22, 2013. At present, he is one of ten Deputy Speakers of the Knesset.

His letter appears on this link and will have my comments interspersed within his text which I reproduced below:

http://www.jewishisrael.org/deal-gaza-letter-pm-netanyahu-moshe-feiglin/


Moshe Feiglin's letter

To Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,

I have just heard that Hamas has taken advantage of the ceasefire to abduct an officer. It looks like this operation is not about to be over any too soon. The failures of this operation were inherent from the outset, because:

1.It has no proper and clear goal

B. There is no appropriate moral framework to support our soldiers

What is required now is for Israel to internalize the fact that Oslo is finished: That this is our country – our country exclusively, including Gaza. There are no two states, and there are no two peoples. There is only one state for one people.

COMMENT:

Moshe didn't really think this through very carefully when he wrote, "there are no two peoples." If there are no two peoples, then (logically speaking) he is saying there is only one people. In fact, he did say "There is only one state for one people." Within this one state, per Mr. Feiglin's logic, are "one people" - some of whom are Jews and some of whom are Palestinian Arabs. I don't know how he thinks these two distinct types constitute "one people," but he wrote that they do. I only wish I could figure out why he had expressed himself so awkwardly. Maybe he thinks of non-Jews as subhumans who can't possibly be part of any peoples.

# # #

After internalizing this, we need a deep and thorough strategic review: Definition of the enemy, definition of the operational tasks, definition of the strategic goals, and of course, of appropriate necessary war ethics.

1. Definition of the enemy: The strategic enemy is extremist Arab Islam in all its metastases – from Iran to Gaza – which seeks to annihilate Israel in its entirety. The immediate enemy is Hamas. (Not the tunnels and not the rockets – Hamas.)

COMMENT:

The enemy is Arabic resentment based on a sense of having been treated unjustly. As long as Israel's Jews continue to believe that "more for me and mine, which means less for you and yours" is acceptable, that resentment will not go away.

# # #

2. Definition of the tasks: Conquest of the entire Gaza Strip and elimination of all fighting forces and their supporters.

COMMENT:

Suppose most of Gaza's population chooses to take a last stand and oppose Israel's ethnic cleansing attempt. And suppose most of them are willing to die, and end up dying, with women and children fighting tanks with sticks and stones. Would that end up being called genocide at war crimes trials conducted by the UN?

# # #

3. Definition of the strategic goal: To turn Gaza into Jaffa, a flourishing Israeli city with a minimum number of hostile civilians.

4. Definition of war ethics: “Woe to the evildoer, and woe to his neighbor”

COMMENT:

"...woe to his neighbor?" Israel is his neighbor. Perhaps he meant to say, "...woe to his supporter."

# # #

In light of these four points, Israel must take the following action:

A. The IDF will designate certain open areas on the Sinai border, adjacent to the sea, in which the civilian population will be gathered, far from the built-up areas that are used for rocket launches and tunneling. In these areas, tent encampments will be established, until relevant emigration destinations are determined. Electricity and water supply to the formerly populated areas will be disconnected.

COMMENT:

Moshe wishes to set up concentration camps - that's what these tent encampments would be.

# # #

B. The formerly populated areas will be shelled with maximum fire power. The entire civilian and military infrastructure of Hamas, its means of communication and of logistics, will be destroyed entirely – down to their foundations.

C. The IDF will divide the Gaza Strip laterally and crosswise, significantly widen the roads, take control of commanding positions, and destroy nests of resistance – if any remain.

D. Israel will start to locate destination countries and immigration quotas for the refugees from Gaza. Those who wish to emigrate will be given a generous economic support package and will arrive at the receiving countries with significant economic capabilities.

COMMENT:

Who gets to determine what constitutes "significant economic capabilities?" Where will this money come from? Will this be above and beyond the compensation that property owners in Gaza should receive for their property destroyed by IDF shelling?

# # #

E. Those who insist on staying, contingent on proof that they have no affiliation with Hamas, will be required to publicly sign a declaration of loyalty to Israel. They will then receive a blue ID card similar to that of the Arabs of East Jerusalem.

COMMENT:

How does one prove they have no affiliation with Hamas? I can't prove I have no affiliation with Hamas, though I live in the USA as a non-Arab! The burden of proof should be on the accuser - that is, the Israeli authorities should have to provide proof that one has an affliation with Hamas, rather than demand that each Gazan prove he has no such affiliation.

Why should Palestinian's have to sign a declaration of loyalty to Israel? Why not simply have them sign a statement they will not engage in hostile acts against Israel?

# # #

F. When the fighting will end, Israeli law will be extended to cover the entire Gaza Strip. The people expelled from Gush Katif will be invited to return to their towns and villages and the city of Gaza and its suburbs will be rebuilt as Israeli tourist and commercial cities.

Mr. Prime Minister,

This is a fateful hour of decision in the history of the State of Israel.

All metastases of our enemy, from Iran and Hizballah through ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood, are gleefully rubbing their hands and preparing themselves for the next round.

I warn that any outcome that is less than what was defined here means encouraging the continued offensive against Israel. Only if Hezbollah will understand how we have dealt with Hamas in the south, will it refrain from launching its 100,000 missiles from the north.

COMMENT:

On the contrary, if Israel makes war on the part of Palestine known as the Gaza strip, Hezbollah might decide to show its displeasure by launching those missiles.

# # #

I call on you to adopt the strategy proposed here.

I have no doubt that, like me, the entire Nation of Israel will overwhelmingly stand by you – if only you will adopt it.

COMMENT:

The "entire Nation of Israel" will not overwhelmingly stand by you. But the Jews of Israel surely will. Unless by "the entire Nation of Israel," Moshe is referring to the "one people" I'd mentioned earlier - some of whom happen to be Palestinian Arabs living within Israel's borders but whom he still mysteriously includes as part of his "one people."

# # #

With Respect and Appreciation,

Moshe Feiglin


Mr. Feiglin's real intentions

Moshe Feiglin is an unabashed Jewish supremacist whose ultimate aim will be to expel all non-Jews from Israel, including those from the West Bank which he will also seek to annex.

Israel today exists, not because "God promised us this land," but because the United Nations decided to play God and dictate that a Jewish homeland be created in the Middle East. Naturally, the Arabs fiercely objected to this as would anyone seeing outsiders interfering in their local affairs.

Try to imagine how the French and Germans might have felt in 1948 if the region of Alsace-Lorraine (with perhaps a bit of adjacent territory taken from Germany) had been emptied of its current residents and transformed into the State of Israel, abandoning any attempt to create such a state in the Middle East. All this by edict of the United Nations. The rationale of course would be that the historic mistreatment of Jews by the German and French would justify this bit of atonement. It wouldn't have taken long for the French and Germans to develop bitter feelings about this land seizure. Nobody likes being told what to do, right? So why should we be so surprised that the Palestinians and the Arab world at large are so angry?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle, just another member of
the Virtual Samgha of the Lotus and
Former Candidate for USA President (in 2008 & 2012)

Contact me at bpa_cinc@yahoo.com



Thursday, August 7, 2014

Comments on the movie "I Origins"

Introduction

This is not a movie review, but only a few of my observations on the recently-released movie "I Origins." These will make sense only to those who have already seen the movie - and I hope that turns out to be everybody! I myself saw this film three times in the only theater in Chicago showing it.

To be sure, this movie has a lot of flaws. But it is also thought-provoking and has an undeniable emotional attraction. And it stays with you. This link is for people who haven't seen the movie, but they will not gain much from my comments below (except, perhaps, the words I devote to karma at the end): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Origins


Is Salomina a reincarnated Sofi?

I was not convinced that 7-year-old Salomina is the reincarnated wife of Dr. Ian Gray. When the elevator door opened (noisily, I might add), Salomina started crying and clung to Dr. Gray who was standing next to her. He took her reaction to stem from her memory of having been cut in half by an elevator in her previous life as Sofi.

I, however, saw another possibility. Salomina was an orphan who felt she was about to be returned to the streets. She had been treated kindly by Dr. Gray, who fed her and showed her what a decent living style looks like - in the form of his elegant hotel room. Maybe the opening of that elevator door signaled to her the end of this promising new beginning, and she was about to resume her former life on the streets. Maybe when she cried and clung to him, it was more in the spirit of, "Please don't send me away."

And when he looks at her face and sees tears streaming down, he has an epiphany - even though his earlier test of her memories as Sofi was inconclusive. Dr. Gray then picks her up. But as he turns away from the elevator to walk down the stairs, we see Salomina smiling as if feeling, "Everything's going to be alright now, he's not going to send me away."

I'm sure the others in the three audiences I was part of believed (or wanted to believe) that Ian had found his reincarnated Sofi. I thought the filmmaker, however, did a great job of leaving room for the alternative explanation I'm offering. The first seed of doubt was when Salomina first set eyes on Ian; there wasn't any flicker of recognition on her part "saying," "Haven't I seen you somewhere before?"

 

Comparison of Two Tests

Ian Gray's infant son and Salomina were both tested for former-life memories. But these tests were markedly different from each other - as different as the subjects themselves.

Salomina was shown sets of three pictures on a page and asked to pick which of the three she liked best. Of course, she had seven years as Salomina that could have reshaped her idea of favorite, from what was Sofi's idea of favorite. One set of pictures stuck in my mind: This page showed a white bird, a turtle, and an elephant. Maybe I'm being sexist here, but what little girl is going to pick a turtle or elephant over an elegant white bird in flight? The white bird was the "correct" answer, but better science would have dictated that the other two images be of other birds, just as pretty though not white.

In the beginning, Salomina chose the correct images. But when she started choosing incorrect ones, her face looked anxious. It seems she then tried to choose the images she thought would please Ian. Salomina should not have learned, immediately after choosing, that her choices were "correct" or "incorrect." Ian should have told Karen, out of this subject's earshot, "Let's use a code: If a choice is correct, I'll say 'Julius' - if incorrect, I'll say 'Caesar.'" Of course, it doesn't matter which code words are used as long as they would be neutral to Salomina's ears - that is, don't pick words like "elevator," "Sofi," "plus," or "minus." These might influence the subject's future answers.

It also makes a difference that Ian not show his pleasure or disappointment in Salomina's answers. And if a set of pictures wasn't up to his standards, he should not be saying, "That wasn't a very good one." In fact, he should have more carefully scrutinized each set of pictures in advance so as to discard any that weren't "very good."

 
The meaning of names

Ian means "God is gracious" - an interesting name for this particular character, Ian Gray being an atheistic scientist. [NOTE: God talk bothers me, but it is a good way to connect to a Western audience.]

Karen means "pure," which is how this Brit Marling character comes across throughout this movie.

Sofi means "wisdom." One can be wise without having an extensive laboratory and years of institutional education under one's belt.

As for Salomina: "Salom" means "peace" in Hebrew, and "ina" is a suffix used to form feminine nouns. I couldn't find the name "Salomina" in any database, so it's either rarely given to a child or is an invention of the script writer. I found this fascinating quote on the meaning of "salom," which speaks volumes on the way "Salomina" was used in this movie:


QUOTE:

[source: http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/peace/ ]

 
The biblical concept of peace...rests heavily on the Hebrew root slm, which means "to be complete" or "to be sound." The verb conveys both a dynamic and a static meaning "to be complete or whole" or "to live well." The noun had many nuances, but can be grouped into four categories: (1) salom [l'v] as wholeness of life or body (i.e., health); (2) salom [l'v] as right relationship or harmony between two parties or people, often established by a covenant...; (3) salom [l'v] as prosperity, success, or fulfillment ...; and (4) salom [l'v] as victory over one's enemies or absence of war. Salom [l'v] was used in both greetings and farewells. It was meant to act as a blessing on the one to whom it was spoken: "May your life be filled with health, prosperity, and victory."

:UNQUOTE.

 
Even though this next source admits that Salomina isn't a name that came up in their database, they nevertheless offer this amazing statement which will give pause to anyone who's seen "I Origins:"

 
QUOTE:

[source: http://www.themeaningofnames.org/?n=Salomina&m=8&d=18&y=1962&go=Go ]

Salomina: I do not know how you feel about it, but you were a female in your last earthly incarnation. You were born somewhere around the territory of Central India approximately on 1275. Your profession was preacher, publisher, scribbler of ancient inscriptions.

Your brief psychological profile in that past life: Timid, constrained, quiet person. You had creative talents, waited until that life to be liberated. Sometimes environment considered you strange. Lessons that your last past life brought to present: Your main task – to make the world more beautiful. Physical and spiritual deserts are just waiting for your touch. Keep smiling! Now do you remember?

:UNQUOTE.

 
I have absolutely no idea upon what authority the preceding paragraph was based. Still...it does add to the overall mystique of the character.

 

What about the name "Kashish?"

On a hunch, I looked up the meaning of the name "Kashish," which is the name of the 10-year-old actress who herself is an orphan in India, who has the role of "Salomina" in the movie:

 
QUOTE:

[source: http://askganesha.co.in/babynames/female-babyname.php?id=Kashish&nam=K ]

Meaning: an attraction

Your first name of Kashish has made you a friendly, approachable, and generous person. This name inclines you to be sympathetic and generous to those in difficult or unfortunate circumstances. You can be firm, positive, and independent in your own ideas and in reaching your own decisions, yet when it comes to taking action or following things through to completion, you often need encouragement. You respond quickly to kind words or any appreciation shown you.

:UNQUOTE.

 
This is a good description of the real-life Kashish as depicted in an article I read describing how she landed the role of Salomina out of 1,400 girls who were also considered.


Dying in the elevator

When Sofi and Ian were trapped in the elevator, I sensed that Sofi knew she was going to die. That's why she wanted Ian to be the first to go to safety. That way, there was a chance that he would live. If she had tried to go first, she knew the elevator would fall, killing both of them.


The Preacher

When Ian brought Salomina back to his hotel, hand-in-hand, he was going to take the elevator to his room. But he saw the preacher waiting for that same elevator, with his back turned toward them. The preacher had said, earlier, "Maybe our paths will cross again." Well, they did - kind of. The preacher stood as an object of consideration. Dr. Gray probably didn't feel like talking to this guy, who had made him uneasy at their first meeting with his over-friendliness. And he also thought: "I don't want this guy to start questioning me, as to why I'm bringing this young girl up to my room."


Adopting Salomina

Ian might have wanted to adopt Salomina, which would have made for some fascinating complications. For one, Karen might have a problem with bringing Ian's former wife into their family. For another, should Salomina ever be told, "Ian was your husband in your last incarnation...but he's your adoptive father now?"

Then there's the issue of where to live. Salomina had been born in India for karmic reasons. Maybe the Gray family should consider relocating to India out of respect for those reasons. Why do so many assume that bringing her to the States would be for the best? Karen and Ian wouldn't have any problem finding jobs in India, even before they learned how to speak Hindi.

I can hear the hue and cry now, "What?! Americans relocating to India?" Why not?

 
The Science & Religion behind the Movie

Is it possible to use Iris Pattern Recognition to identify someone who has been reincarnated? Speaking as a Buddhist, I will say, "Yes, but only if the deceased had chosen to keep his unique pattern when the time came for his rebirth." As for the extreme case of a Hitler, he'd have no control since his next birth - after spending eons in hell - would be as a dung beetle. I doubt that beetle would have the kind of eyes that could accommodate the human Hitler's iris patterns.

I hope the filmmaker isn't trying to say that our iris patterns are some kind of eternal markers of our unique identities. There are bodhisattvas who are so advanced in their practices as being able to shapeshift at will into a variety of animate and inanimate manifestations. So it's doubtful that any vestige of a former incarnation (such as an iris pattern) would be an immutable constant.

As for Intelligent Design, we can have that without having to have an Intelligent Designer. For ID is nothing more than karma. If we insist on such a designer existing, why only one? And why couldn't each of us, in our own cases at least, be considered that Designer? We craft our own "destinies," why not our own appearances?

I don't think of my own eyes as having evolved, as much as having been the product of my own behavior (again, karma) over the course of trillions of lifetimes. In the Buddhist context, having eyes is only part of the equation:


QUOTE*:

If in the midst of the great assembly
someone with a fearless mind
preaches this Lotus Sutra,
listen to the benefits he will receive!

Such a person gains superior eyes
with eight hundred benefits.
As a result of these adornments
his eyes will become extremely pure.
With the eyes received at birth from his parents
he will be able to view the major world system,
its inner and outer parts,...
down as far as the Avichi hell,
up to the Summit of Being heaven.
And he will see all the living beings
in their midst.
Though he has not yet gained heavenly eyes,
the power of his physical eyes will be such as this.

:UNQUOTE.


Tell you what. If such "superior eyes" were to be dissected, no surgeon or researcher would be able to tell why these eyes would be capable of such feats.
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Steven Searle, just another member of
the Virtual Samgha of the Lotus and
Former candidate for USA President (in 2008 & 2012)

Contact me at bpa_cinC@yahoo.com

Footnote: * Page 292 of "The Lotus Sutra and Its Opening and Closing Sutras," translated by Burton Watson, published by Soka Gakkai in 2009.